Margovy is a stronger fit when
A venue that wants guest capture, automated follow-up and review collection in one straightforward package.
- Preset email follow-up
- Consent evidence
- Print-ready QR and material credit
Evidence checked 6 September 2026
Margovy vs CaptiveWiFi
Both products target practical venue Wi-Fi. Margovy bundles follow-up emails and print materials; CaptiveWiFi publishes deeper portal, connected-page and integration controls.
CaptiveWiFi is a stronger fit when
A venue that prioritises portal control, A/B testing, paid Wi-Fi, API access or a large connector catalogue.
- Advanced portal controls
- Connected-page A/B testing
- 50+ documented integrations and API
Feature comparison
What is live, documented or still unclear
Margovy availability comes from the current product. CaptiveWiFi availability comes from the vendor's public pages. A missing public claim is marked unclear rather than treated as absent.
Branded guest Wi-Fi page
Margovy
CaptiveWiFi
Vendor documents it
Portal controls include custom fonts, video and device-specific backgrounds.
Marketing consent record
Margovy
CaptiveWiFi
Customer profiles and visit history
Margovy
CaptiveWiFi
Vendor documents it
Exportable guest records and integrations are documented.
Visit-triggered email automations
Margovy
CaptiveWiFi
Public evidence unclear
Marketing automation is claimed, but the reviewed sources do not establish comparable visit-triggered email presets.
Review requests and private feedback
Margovy
CaptiveWiFi
One-off email campaigns
Margovy
CaptiveWiFi
Public evidence unclear
Reviewed pricing does not state a one-off outbound email allowance.
Saved customer segments
Margovy
CaptiveWiFi
Public evidence unclear
The reviewed sources do not establish a native saved-segment builder.
SMS campaigns
Margovy
CaptiveWiFi
Public evidence unclear
Consent capture is documented; an outbound SMS product is not clear.
Customer API and prebuilt integrations
Margovy
Public evidence unclear
No customer-facing API or connector catalogue is currently published.
CaptiveWiFi
Vendor documents it
Growth lists API, webhooks and integrations; the partner page lists 50+.
Multi-location management
Margovy
CaptiveWiFi
Print-ready QR and physical materials
Margovy
Available now
Downloadable print QR, a materials catalogue and £20 new-customer credit.
CaptiveWiFi
Public evidence unclear
Reviewed public evidence does not establish printed collateral.
Pricing
Compare the published cost and what it covers
Prices use each supplier’s published currency and billing basis. Competitor tax is left unstated where the supplier does not publish it. Ask for a current quote before buying.
Margovy
Grow
£29 a month or £290 a year
One small venue. VAT included. Venue size can add £10 or £20 a month.
Plus
£49 a month or £490 a year
One small venue. VAT included. Includes five automations and reviews.
Max
£69 a month or £690 a year
One small venue. VAT included. Includes saved segments. Campaigns and SMS remain planned.
CaptiveWiFi
Starter
Free
One venue with unlimited Wi-Fi visits.
Growth monthly
£40 a month
Per venue. Tax basis is not stated.
Growth annual
£33 a month billed annually
£396 paid for the year. Tax basis is not stated.
Common questions
Choosing between Margovy and CaptiveWiFi
These answers use public evidence reviewed on 6 September 2026.
How does Margovy pricing compare with CaptiveWiFi?
Margovy Grow starts at £29 a month including VAT for a small venue. CaptiveWiFi Growth is £40 monthly or £33 a month billed annually, with its tax basis unstated. CaptiveWiFi also has a free Starter tier.
Which has the stronger connected page?
CaptiveWiFi publishes returning-visitor targeting, click analytics, A/B testing and wallet links. Margovy supports scheduled links and aggregate tap counts, but not A/B testing.
Which includes automated emails?
Margovy publishes two preset emails on Grow and five on Plus. CaptiveWiFi claims marketing automation, but the reviewed public pricing does not give a comparable outbound-email allowance.
Vendor claims have not been independently tested. Unknown means the reviewed public sources did not answer the question.